|
|||||||||
|
|
U.S. Universities Face Turbulent Times AheadAll across campus, changes are ahead for students, faculty, administrators and parents alike
The largest-ever group of students is packing its bags for college. And these students aren't just the sons and daughters of affluent, white families from the suburbs, as they were a generation or two ago. An increasing number are poor and older, and they're more likely to be minorities and to need financial aid. At the same time, cash-strapped states are trimming their spending on public universities and community colleges. All that means many campuses are crowded, tuitions are rising, there's more demand for aid, qualified students are being turned away, and competition for admission to prestige colleges has never been tougher. Here are a few trends to watch as colleges grapple with these demographic and economic tests: 1. Costs Keep RisingTuition has been climbing at two or three times the inflation rate for three decades, and public-university prices rose at least 10% in eight of the past 22 years, says the College Board. Now, the question isn't whether tuition will continue to rise, but by how much. Two years ago, many state governments cut their yearly payments to their universities, triggering big tuition increases. With state economies rebounding, those cuts may have bottomed out. But state funding now accounts for only about 37% of college budgets, down from half two decades ago, and that means colleges are relying more on tuition to pay the bills. When tuition goes up, however, universities face bigger demands for financial aid, which they fund, in part, by...raising tuition again. Meanwhile, the competition among colleges to raise their standing in college-ratings guides means a bidding war is under way for hotshot professors. And the increased fund-raising demands on college presidents mean they're now commanding Wall Street-size salaries. Still, with demand for college seats likely to remain high, the colleges have little incentive to be too stingy with themselves. "No one is pushing for efficiency very hard," says Ohio University economist Richard Vedder. 2. Diversity Is EndangeredEven with a flood of students to choose from, colleges are competing for the same relatively small pool of teenagers with top grades, high admissions-test scores and stellar transcripts. That favors youngsters from affluent families and suburban high schools, who are edging out the low-income students whose numbers are soaring. Many affluent students who might once have assumed they would head for top private schools are finding the competition stiffer because of their numbers, and increasingly they are enrolling in public flagship universities. That's pushing the lower-income students, who tend to be less prepared, into second-tier schools, leaving many top schools less diverse. But packing a freshman class with National Merit Scholars -- even if it means paying them to attend -- has its own rewards. Bright students raise a school's ratings in college guides. That makes recruiting other top students easier, helps attract superstar professors and lures big-dollar gifts from happy admirers. Those rewards become increasingly important as public colleges turn to private donors to replace the funding that taxpayers once supplied. Although colleges widely use affirmative action to increase minority enrollment, they have been less avid when it comes to recruiting low-income students, and economic diversity is narrowed. Public colleges are "busy managing their profits and prestige, and turning away from their mission," frets education economist Tom Mortenson. 3. Merit Merits AidFinancial aid once went to the poorest kids. Now, grants awarded for academic merit or special talent in sports or the arts are growing faster than grants based on need. States spend 25% of their scholarship money on merit awards, up from 10% a decade ago, while private colleges have gone to a 36% merit share, up from 27%. Private colleges have always used merit aid to round out their orchestras or sports teams, of course. But now they increasingly see merit aid as a way to help them win the ratings-guide race and to "shape" a freshman class by, for example, recruiting science majors. Fifteen states, meanwhile, are using merit scholarships to lure bright in-state students to their local universities. The states calculate that the tactic will motivate high schoolers and raise the rates of those going to college, keep educated young people in-state after graduation, and make themselves more attractive to employers. Florida and Georgia are finding their merit-aid programs hugely expensive, but politically difficult to scale back. Even so, another half-dozen states are looking at their own merit plans. 4. A New LookThe competition for students has set off a building boom as colleges splurge on such amenities as "wellness centers," food-court cafeterias and, most recently, student unions with sports bars, night clubs and the requisite soaring atrium (Ohio University's is five stories tall). Universities see lavish facilities as a recruiting tool: Kids can't tell much about a school's academic quality on a visit, but they can visualize themselves sitting under a tree in the glass-enclosed Main Street that's part of every new student union. Students at the University of Vermont, which is building a $52 million center, included an outdoor amphitheater among their top priorities. The University of Minnesota's newly renovated student union features a fountain, cast in Italy in 1620, outside its "fireplace lounges." Ohio State University plans a $100 million center.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk about niches: A growing number of schools are marketing themselves as places that emphasize teaching, of all things. Among them, the College of Charleston says it teaches its students how to do research, but has spurned doing research itself in favor of teaching. "We have a special niche -- it's the teacher-scholar model," says Charleston Vice President Virginia Freedman.
Giving up research aspirations generally consigns colleges to second- or third-tier status and means forgoing the research grants that help pay for the labs and science buildings that state budget cuts have made prohibitive. But with tuitions rising, and students incurring years of debt to finance their educations, it's also tougher for universities to consign undergraduate teaching to part-timers while high-priced professors huddle in their labs.
With state-government funding on the decline, universities are looking for new sources to fill the gap -- or, as Arizona State's Mr. Crow puts it, "we're broadening our investor list."
Arizona State, which plans to almost double in size to 92,000 students over the next 12 years, has turned to the taxpayers of Phoenix, Scottsdale and Mesa to help build new campuses in their cities. Phoenix put up "several hundred million" dollars in land, infrastructure and construction, and Scottsdale pledged $120 million.
UC Merced is developing a 1,200-acre residential community that it expects will help fund future operations and construction. And Arizona State is talking with a developer about putting a "regional amenity" on 100 acres of a 6,000-acre housing tract. Mr. Crow talks of an academic school or program on the site, but says so far he hasn't made a deal.
|
This article is reprinted with permission from Career Journal, the executive career site of the Wall Street Journal. IMDiversity.com is committed to presenting diverse points of view. However, the viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at IMD. |
|
|
||
|